\item{Djangocon has chosen a huge set of non-free, discriminatory platforms. Thankfully, they backed off a bit when we raised that Tom would not be able to attend his own talk without violating the terms of the platforms involved, but young people are still second-class citizens as it stands. Everyone orgnaising conferences should strive to keep barriers for online participation as low as they would for an in-person conference}
\item{Enabling every group of people to use the most critical parts of the venue, online or offline, is a good start. However, the goal must be to enable them to use all parts, without exception.}
\item{For an online conference, the excluded groups are less obvious, and children are less visible as a marginalised group than, e.g., wheelchair users.}
\item{It is even legitimate for an adult to not want to accept the drawbacks of commercial terms of use, and those nede to be heard as well (much comparable to lunch at a conference — vegetarianism, e.g., is also a free choice, but today no conference would offer lunch without a vegetarian option.}
\item{It is even legitimate for an adult to not want to accept the drawbacks of commercial terms of use, and those need to be heard as well (much comparable to lunch at a conference — vegetarianism, e.g., is also a free choice, but today no conference would offer lunch without a vegetarian option.}
