mirabilos authored 5 years ago and mirabilos committed 5 years ago

according to https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX/Creating_Packages

mirabilos authored 6 years ago and mirabilos committed 6 years ago

use the same as for unicodedomino_kernel_fixup_f4_and_checkseq.def
since we can’t check for other added macros etc. yet… we could,
conceivably, use a version check, but given that this is not yet
released, I’m wary of that, and we submit the checkseq RSN

mirabilos authored 6 years ago and mirabilos committed 6 years ago

PR was accepted but does not use this helper macro,
and so does not define it either

mirabilos authored 6 years ago and mirabilos committed 6 years ago

further submissions are waiting on upstream testsuite bugfixes

mirabilos authored 6 years ago and mirabilos committed 6 years ago

rationale: in it, we can check for macro existence and load
other macros depending on it, while in the others we replace
upstream-provided or undefined macros sometimes

mirabilos authored 6 years ago and mirabilos committed 6 years ago

also, dual-LPPL on everything shared with upstream,
for easier inclusion (also consider copying back…)

mirabilos authored 6 years ago and mirabilos committed 6 years ago

alternatively, rewriting those to be expandable *might* help…

mirabilos authored 6 years ago and mirabilos committed 6 years ago

which we still need in production at some site

mirabilos authored 6 years ago and mirabilos committed 6 years ago

one (namely \decode@UTFviii) soon™

mirabilos authored 6 years ago and mirabilos committed 6 years ago

makes it more robust, even though it doesn’t fix listings files

also bump to 1.4

mirabilos authored 6 years ago and mirabilos committed 6 years ago

matching how these have been fed back upstream; David Carlisle
said it’ll be merged in, up to, a few weeks

mirabilos authored 6 years ago and mirabilos committed 6 years ago

also, drop trailing periods from messages; 1.3